Talk:Main Page
Guideline for structure
Let's agree slowly on a guideline for the wiki structure otherwise it will end having several pages about related topics --Pier4r (talk) 20:53, 22 August 2017 (CEST)
For example I am going to (slowly) collect the info of all those meta thread about the game. I'll put this under the page/namespace "Meta information". So like: "Meta information:data:recorded_best_scores" --Pier4r (talk) 21:04, 22 August 2017 (CEST)
I think there should be an easy to use navigation tree. All articles should be accessible by 2 or 3 steps. For your example: IMO there should be an article about the elo and in it should be the link to the subpage elo_recorded_best_scores or similar. I don't mind the naming convention this much. For me it is important to have it either direct in the navigation tree or easy to find in the articles of it. --LuBeNo (talk) 11:21, 26 August 2017 (CEST)
- Yeah that is not a problem. The idea of main pages shown in a tree with 2-3 clicks is reasonable (having everything 2-3 clicks away is not). For example: introduction page -> "meta" (one click), then a list of subtopics and "best scores" (2nd click).
- I do like the actual list of topics. Yet I am unsure about the Strategies section. That can grow slowly. I mean, I will keep the structure but I would compress the "Strategies" section to one page that then can be split up.
- Another point is: in general is not bad to set a topic first, and then see how things evolve from this refactoring the pages. For example imagine a page about strategies. It grows, and then get split in more pages. Trying to do everything detailed from the start may backfire.
