Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=== Videos === | === Videos === | ||
| − | As an heavy wiki user, I do not see videos properly unless they are organized in their pages (like a page for videos). Normally videos breaks the flow of reading (indeed they do not require reading at all) and so mess up with an entire page unless they are at the end or, as wrote, in their own pages. | + | As an heavy wiki user, I do not see videos properly unless they are organized in their pages (like a page for videos). Normally videos breaks the flow of reading (indeed they do not require reading at all) and so mess up with an entire page unless they are at the end or, as wrote, in their own pages. --[[User:Pier4r|Pier4r]] ([[User talk:Pier4r|talk]]) 12:05, 3 September 2017 (CEST) |
Revision as of 12:05, 3 September 2017
Guideline for structure
Let's agree slowly on a guideline for the wiki structure otherwise it will end having several pages about related topics --Pier4r (talk) 20:53, 22 August 2017 (CEST)
For example I am going to (slowly) collect the info of all those meta thread about the game. I'll put this under the page/namespace "Meta information". So like: "Meta information:data:recorded_best_scores" --Pier4r (talk) 21:04, 22 August 2017 (CEST)
I think there should be an easy to use navigation tree. All articles should be accessible by 2 or 3 steps. For your example: IMO there should be an article about the elo and in it should be the link to the subpage elo_recorded_best_scores or similar. I don't mind the naming convention this much. For me it is important to have it either direct in the navigation tree or easy to find in the articles of it. --LuBeNo (talk) 11:21, 26 August 2017 (CEST)
- Yeah that is not a problem. The idea of main pages shown in a tree with 2-3 clicks is reasonable (having everything 2-3 clicks away is not). For example: introduction page -> "meta" (one click), then a list of subtopics and "best scores" (2nd click).
- I do like the actual list of topics. Yet I am unsure about the Strategies section. That can grow slowly. I mean, I will keep the structure but I would compress the "Strategies" section to one page that then can be split up.
- Another point is: in general is not bad to set a topic first, and then see how things evolve from this refactoring the pages. For example imagine a page about strategies. It grows, and then get split in more pages. Trying to do everything detailed from the start may backfire.
--Pier4r (talk) 12:58, 26 August 2017 (CEST)
Videos
As an heavy wiki user, I do not see videos properly unless they are organized in their pages (like a page for videos). Normally videos breaks the flow of reading (indeed they do not require reading at all) and so mess up with an entire page unless they are at the end or, as wrote, in their own pages. --Pier4r (talk) 12:05, 3 September 2017 (CEST)
